- Posts: 70
- Thank you received: 0
Smith machine vs. normal Bench press
- Catsmasher
- Topic Author
- Senior Member
-
I go to a private gym in the estates I stay at and train alone so my only option to add heavier weights to my bench press is through using the Smith-machine.I dont have a spotter and dont want to end up with weight tread marks on my body when I fail with the normal bench press.
a Few people told me that the normal Bench press bar is harder and works better because you also have to balance the weights and that you exercise more different muscles with the normal bar.
Which makes sense I think...
But also! the Smith-machine forces you to bench press straight up on the tracks(rails) so you not allowed to push at a angle which you always do with the normal bench press bar.It also feels that the tracks can provide resistance if they not greased up enough.
I have been gymming from January and using the Smith-machine and Dumbell bench press the last 3 months.I have been able to add more weight to it from January untill now and maxxing on 100kg.
- What I want to know is am I wasting my time using this machine?
- Does the normal bench work better and more muscle groups?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- spike
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1340
- Thank you received: 153
Um, but im scared of needles...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gearedup
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 487
- Thank you received: 0
yes "free weights " are better as your body employs stabilser muscles as well which arent incorporated when using machines , but each has a place in ones arsenol, the fact you use dumbells as well brings them into play, so i wouldnt be to concerned think you have best of both worlds.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Sting
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1775
- Thank you received: 3
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SNOK1986
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1798
- Thank you received: 103
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Catsmasher
- Topic Author
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 70
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Roozer
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 582
- Thank you received: 5
Ive had this topic up for discussion a few times with a few people I know and haven really reached a conclusion.
I go to a private gym in the estates I stay at and train alone so my only option to add heavier weights to my bench press is through using the Smith-machine.I dont have a spotter and dont want to end up with weight tread marks on my body when I fail with the normal bench press.
a Few people told me that the normal Bench press bar is harder and works better because you also have to balance the weights and that you exercise more different muscles with the normal bar.
Which makes sense I think...
But also! the Smith-machine forces you to bench press straight up on the tracks(rails) so you not allowed to push at a angle which you always do with the normal bench press bar.It also feels that the tracks can provide resistance if they not greased up enough.
I have been gymming from January and using the Smith-machine and Dumbell bench press the last 3 months.I have been able to add more weight to it from January untill now and maxxing on 100kg.
- What I want to know is am I wasting my time using this machine?
- Does the normal bench work better and more muscle groups?
I fell in love with the smith machine got my strength up extremely well. Went from maxxing from 100 to 140kg getting out 6 good reps, it feels that it concentrates the chest bloody well, and with normal bench to be honest i still have a mental block, insured my shoulder. was te windgat.
I do my smith and incorporate other exercises, funny enough what works for me is, doin 3 weeks just machines and 3 week raw weights. always starting with smith and do one drop set. but thats just me.
Everyone has their own little ritual. IF IT WORKS WHY CHANGE IT.IMO
As ek storm volg my, as ek omdraai skiet my, as ek sterwe wreek my, so help my God
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Barbell
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 492
- Thank you received: 0
In your case I wouldn`t be using it at all as I would consider it a waste of time to be isolating most muscles as you have only been hitting the gym for a short period of time. I would concentrate on getting all muscles stronger by focusing on more, if not all, compound exercises. It’s pointless getting the major muscles stronger at the expense of the supporting muscles.Once you have gained overall strength, size etc then try the isolation excercises.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Empire
-
- Expert
-
- Posts: 10256
- Thank you received: 2421
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jackrabbit1
-
- Expert
-
- Posts: 3099
- Thank you received: 428
Thats to say it catches - i've experienced failure where i couldt get the catch on - luckily the safety was set and my partner reacted quickly.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- LSJ
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 367
- Thank you received: 0
Personal opinion is that you're looking for trouble using a isolation exercise for large muscle group to often. Like said before it doesnt work your stabalizing muscles which is the ones keeping you from getting hurt.
Also with Spike - can do 160kg flat-bench without arching, cheating ect but only about 110kg in Smith-machine.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.