Testosterone Sub Q

  • SteveC
  • Topic Author
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
29 Oct 2014 13:20 #176852 by SteveC
Testosterone Sub Q was created by SteveC
hey guys

i came across something the other day, but apparently if you are doing low dosage testosterone that there are now studies out that say you can shoot it sub q with out loosing any efficacy?

anyone have some thoughts into this?

thanks

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Rhino
  • Expert
  • Expert
More
29 Oct 2014 13:30 #176854 by Rhino
Replied by Rhino on topic Testosterone Sub Q
It's one of the ways some people on TRT do it. It's for low doses

Go big or go home...
The following user(s) said Thank You: SteveC

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • SteveC
  • Topic Author
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
29 Oct 2014 13:31 #176855 by SteveC
Replied by SteveC on topic Testosterone Sub Q
thanks, i am looking at doing 125mg 2x a week, and to pin IM is a bit of a ballache if you ask me.

thanks

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Rhino
  • Expert
  • Expert
More
29 Oct 2014 13:36 #176857 by Rhino
Replied by Rhino on topic Testosterone Sub Q
Why are you going to run such a low dose? It doesnt make seance to shut yourself down for that :blink:

Go big or go home...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • SteveC
  • Topic Author
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
29 Oct 2014 13:43 - 29 Oct 2014 13:56 #176860 by SteveC
Replied by SteveC on topic Testosterone Sub Q
its only for the first 6 weeks :) i have used alot before :) just starting slowly and then going to go up... slowly slowly catch a monkey :)

edit :

i am the kind of guy that if i can grow decently on 250mg for the first 6 weeks then there is no need to go massive in the dosage for the next 6 weeks. if its working then why change it ;)

i have had decent results on 250mg test before a week,but with decent training and diet i think i will be good to go :)
Last edit: 29 Oct 2014 13:56 by SteveC.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Muscleaddict
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
29 Oct 2014 14:14 #176862 by Muscleaddict
Replied by Muscleaddict on topic Testosterone Sub Q
This sounds like a bunch of bullshit. Long estered T doesn't do anything significant for the first 5-6 weeks even at 500-600mg/week and you are claiming you can "grow decently on 250mg for the first 6 weeks"?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • SteveC
  • Topic Author
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
29 Oct 2014 14:30 #176865 by SteveC
Replied by SteveC on topic Testosterone Sub Q
Wow, thanks for such a friendly reply muscleaddict.

Yes I have grown decently in the past on 250mg cyp a week, strict dieting and training and 4kgs lbm gain and 5kg body fat drop in 12 weeks is decent in my opinion.

Sorry for even bothering and clearly insulting your intelligence it seems.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Kuifie
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
More
29 Oct 2014 14:44 #176867 by Kuifie
Replied by Kuifie on topic Testosterone Sub Q
SteveC drop the attitude towards guys such as MA.

Give me the strength to forgive those who curl in the sqaut rack
The following user(s) said Thank You: Ontong

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Chem1
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
More
29 Oct 2014 17:20 #176878 by Chem1
Replied by Chem1 on topic Testosterone Sub Q
Talking from my first AAS experience I grew off 300mg/week.

If the gear is very good I can see how it's possible to make SOME gains on 250/week for a newbie.

My understanding of SQ is its slower absorbing. Other than that no difference. I prefer muscle though. I don't even do my peptides SQ cos for me the area is aggravated more easy than a slab of muscle.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Muscleaddict
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
29 Oct 2014 18:53 #176883 by Muscleaddict
Replied by Muscleaddict on topic Testosterone Sub Q
I am calling BS on getting decent gains from 6 weeks on 250mg of test cyp. Not that it's possible to get gains on a 12 week cycle where you up the dose for the last half or run 300mg for 12 weeks. No matter what your genetics are like low dose test cyp will not give much quality gains the first 5-6 weeks.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Cracker
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
More
30 Oct 2014 14:18 #176945 by Cracker
Replied by Cracker on topic Testosterone Sub Q
With my understanding of endocrinology I can't see the difference between a SubQ and IM. As hormones can be absorbed from almost any place in the body, however when looking at the placebo effect an injection is stronger placebo than a pill. So maybe you will gain less at the start of the cycle, but this is all theory.
Personally I will stick to IM, it's tried and tested

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Muscleaddict
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
30 Oct 2014 15:12 - 30 Oct 2014 15:13 #176956 by Muscleaddict
Replied by Muscleaddict on topic Testosterone Sub Q

Cracker wrote: With my understanding of endocrinology I can't see the difference between a SubQ and IM.


Bioavailability of injected steroids is even affected by where you inject them. For example if you inject your deca in your glutes the bioavailability is significantly higher than when injected in your delts. This info has been published in studies. With HCG injections it's the same story. The bioavailability is slightly higher when injected IM vs sub q.
Last edit: 30 Oct 2014 15:13 by Muscleaddict.
The following user(s) said Thank You: charliechan

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Powered by Kunena Forum